Ethics and Leadership in Engineering

Engineers play a signifi female genitaliat part in the development, prosperity and prophyl turn of eventsic of tidy sum around the globe. The primary exercise of engineers is to let on/sense and respond to a need by constructing or creating a solution with accepted specific ladderlines. While it is the responsibility of engineers to develop such(prenominal) structures, it is overly their responsibility that their basis serves the function in a befitting manner, take all pencil eraser precautions magical spell making it and give the galosh directions to the users after handing it over.DiscussionThese structures, however, do not stay safe forever. No matter how safe a construction or a creation is, it reveals its failure after some period. Eventually these failures lead to dire consequences some time. Engineers get by all the time to avoid failures and make their solution safer and more efficient. sometime(prenominal) mere lacking of professional ethics is the reason.In UK , the seriousness of estimable issues, which arise in professional lives of engineers, has been accepted recently. However, in USA this has been recognized for some time. Their universities offer substantial guidance and support to their professionals. The Royal academy of Engineering, in 2005, initiated the process and brought its publishing in the form of Statement of honest Principles, which outlines the specific ways in which engineers across UK are committed to upholding certain estimable values.During the same time, UK Engineering Council amended its standards for chartered and incorporated engineers, in order to increase sensibleness of ethical issues. It appears that this has resulted in having a clayey effect as many universities flummox incorporated ethical spot in their studies.Professional Engineers try to develop solutions that improve the health and safety conditions for the welfare of society. The statement of Ethical Principles sets standards for profession al Engineers (Statement of Ethical Principles. 2005). It presents quartet principles that guide engineers in their professional duties. It includes Accuracy and Rigour, Honesty and Integrity, Respect for life, Law and the humans Good, and Responsible leadership.Accuracy and Rigour means, Engineers have the responsibility to acquire and begin the information relevant to their practices they should also keep their knowledge up to date. It is also the responsibility to always act with care as their profession requires a strong commitment. They should only perform their services in the field of relevant competence. Since the technical knowledge, an Engineer cease understand are not light for the others, therefore, it is the duty of engineers to not knowingly mislead others as it can have dire consequences and therefore unethical.Honesty and Integrity means engineers should act with lavishly standards of professional ethics. They should not accept any bribery or confutable payment from anyone. They should act in the best interest of employer, unless it is not in conflict with rights of the other party.Respect for Life, Law and the Public Good, entails that engineers should be aware of relevant laws and regulations and should gain accordingly. Conservation of nature and its resources should be a priority. They should act in the best manner that does not bring bad visit to their profession.Responsible leadinghip involves practicing high level of standards and leaders in the heed of technology. Provide awareness to the public. Listen to the concern of the society.Adhering to these principles will bring trade good name to the profession and will make sure that it achieves what it is meant to be, welfare of society. However, we can have numerous examples from the past, of such negligence and improper conduct in this respected profession. In past successive accidents of groomway occurred in UK, which were subsequently fully investigated. These include the accident of Clapham Junction rail crash, on 12 December 1988.35 people killed bit 100 injured, when oncoming choose ran into wreckage. Another on, 19 September 1997, Southall rail crash, killed 6 people and cl injured. It occurred because of a collision with freight train. On 5 October 1999, Ladbroke Grove rail crash happened, when train passed the signal at danger and resulted in the headman on collision, killed 21 while 523 injured. Investigation reports show that these could have been prevented by timely action of professional engineers. In America, a TV come on Tower collapsed in 1982, killing several(prenominal) people. Later investigation showed that safety measures were not taken as should have been (Uff, 2012, Pp13). closeEngineering is a much respected profession. This respect demands responsibility. Adhering to rules but there arise ethical responsibilities too. However, if professional engineers stick to the four principles and apply them in their activities, it will certainly add more value to this profession for sure.Running Head leadership techniquesManagers do things right, while leaders do the right thing.Name of writerName of institutionManagers do things right, while leaders do the right thingThesis StatementManagers do things right, while leaders do the right thing.IntroductionLeaders cook and change cultures, while motorbuss and administrators live within them. (Edward Schein)Managers do things right, while leaders do the right thing. Leader also sounds similar to the manager to the common man. But we know there are subtle differences. It takes a totally different approach to become a leader. These subtle differences create the difference that is visible in performances of organizations.There have been many theories on leadership and steering. Talking about whether a manager is born or developed, what styles are of management exist and which is appropriate. Also, what a leader does, where his/her power comes from. first off of all we will differentiate between a leader and a manager. Then we will discuss some models and theories related to it.DiscussionThe role of a manager is to achieve goals effectively and efficiently, by planning, organizing, co-ordinating and controlling. The importance of time is immense. On the other hand, leaders create and communicate a vision, wherefore energise their followers towards achieving that vision. Leaders create a culture of share values, beliefs and rituals to challenge the status quo. Managers use position authority to make subordinates work towards goals. While leaders motivate and inspire their followers to achieve their goals. now the trait theory (born leaders) is criticized more. It is argued that even leadership has different styles, which are versed with experience rather than born traits (Daft, 2003, Pp.518). Ashridge Management College did research and found four major classifications of management styles. Tells, sells, consults, spliff. In tell style, the manager is autocratic, making a purpose and imposing it on others. In sell style, manager calm makes a conclusion on self like basis, but attempt to explain the logic behind it. In consult style, manager makes decision but in consultation with his/her subordinates. The most democratic style is join style, where manager himself becomes part of the team that makes joint decisions, and also claims the responsibility of that decision afterwards.Research indicates managers are generally thought to be having told or sell style. While employees prefer consult style. Choosing which style is more appropriate, depends on several factors. Contingency approach by Charles Handy suggests that four factors need to be understood to answer this headspring. The environment, task or people, trust or control, want or respect (Schermerhorn 2012, Pp.266). Each particular combination of these factors results in a different situation and, therefore, requires a different tailored approach of managemen t towards it (Robbins & Judge, 2010, Pp.393).Michigan and Harvard identified two basic types of leaders. Task orient and people or relation orientated leaders. Both have their knowledge advantages and disadvantages. Ohio state research suggests that task orientation and people orientation can be achieved simultaneously they are not mutually exclusive. Blakes management grid proves this research by suggesting rather than asking a question that a manager should be task or people oriented ask to what extent a manager should be task and people oriented (Daft, 2003, Pp.522).Managers and leaders differ in their approaches towards performing similar tasks. The approach of management is routine in nature. They like to work under conditions of certainty, strive to gain as much information as they gain, take relatively less risk. Leaders on the hand challenge the status quo. They speak about changing the culture and create followers with their motivation and persuasions skills. Leader s create a shared culture towards achieving the vision that followers own.ConclusionWho is best, a leader or manager is, however, a question depending on what needs to be accomplished. If it is a routine or not so dynamic environment, wherefore decision tilts in favour towards manager. While if it involves dealing with changing and fluctuating situation with lots of risk involved then it will require the initiative approach of a leader.